Review



anti mouse cd8a antibody  (Bio X Cell)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bio X Cell is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bio X Cell manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 97

    Structured Review

    Bio X Cell anti mouse cd8a antibody
    Anti Mouse Cd8a Antibody, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1098 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse cd8a antibody/product/Bio X Cell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1098 article reviews
    anti mouse cd8a antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    97/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Bioss anti cd8 pe
    Anti Cd8 Pe, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd8 pe/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cd8 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec cd8a
    Cd8a, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd8a/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Elabscience Biotechnology apc anti mouse cd8a antibody
    Glycolysis inhibition-mediated blockade of H3K18la in HCC cells restores the function of co-cultured <t>CD8</t> + T cells (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. (B) Changes in lactate levels in Huh7 cells after treatment with 2-DG or oxamate. (C–E) Representative WB results showing the levels of Pan Kla and H3K18la in Huh7 cells treated with inhibitors. (F) Lactate levels in DKO cells with or without lactate supplementation. (G and H) WB analysis of the protein levels of LDHA, LDHB, Pan Kla, and H3K18la in DKO cells with or without lactate treatment. H3 and β-actin were used as loading controls for lactylation markers and LDH isoforms, respectively. (I) Colony formation assays show the proliferation of HCC cells (control group vs. DKO group) cultured alone or co-cultured with CD8 + T cells. (J) Quantitative analysis of the proliferation of co-cultured CD8 + T cells by FC. (K) FC analysis of the expression levels of GzMB (L) and IFN-γ (M) in co-cultured CD8 + T cells. All data are shown as mean ± SD. (B, D, E, and G) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, (J) analyzed by two-way ANOVA, and (K) was analyzed by Student’s t test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Experiments were repeated three times.
    Apc Anti Mouse Cd8a Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/apc anti mouse cd8a antibody/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    apc anti mouse cd8a antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Elabscience Biotechnology e ab f1104e rrid ab 3740201
    Glycolysis inhibition-mediated blockade of H3K18la in HCC cells restores the function of co-cultured <t>CD8</t> + T cells (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. (B) Changes in lactate levels in Huh7 cells after treatment with 2-DG or oxamate. (C–E) Representative WB results showing the levels of Pan Kla and H3K18la in Huh7 cells treated with inhibitors. (F) Lactate levels in DKO cells with or without lactate supplementation. (G and H) WB analysis of the protein levels of LDHA, LDHB, Pan Kla, and H3K18la in DKO cells with or without lactate treatment. H3 and β-actin were used as loading controls for lactylation markers and LDH isoforms, respectively. (I) Colony formation assays show the proliferation of HCC cells (control group vs. DKO group) cultured alone or co-cultured with CD8 + T cells. (J) Quantitative analysis of the proliferation of co-cultured CD8 + T cells by FC. (K) FC analysis of the expression levels of GzMB (L) and IFN-γ (M) in co-cultured CD8 + T cells. All data are shown as mean ± SD. (B, D, E, and G) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, (J) analyzed by two-way ANOVA, and (K) was analyzed by Student’s t test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Experiments were repeated three times.
    E Ab F1104e Rrid Ab 3740201, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/e ab f1104e rrid ab 3740201/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    e ab f1104e rrid ab 3740201 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Elabscience Biotechnology fitc anti mouse cd8a
    Elevated ABHD16A triggered by ACh was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. A, Representative IHC images of ABHD16A expression in human normal gastric tissues and gastric cancer tissues from the TMA with magnifications of 40×, 100×, and 200×. Scale bar for 200×, 100 μm. B–D, Relationship of ABHD16A IHC score to clinical stage ( B ), pT stage ( C ), and lymph node metastasis ( n = 80; D ). E, Cumulative survival curves of patients with gastric cancer with high or low ABHD16A expression based on the TMA. F, IHC images and score of ABHD16A in S100 + or S100 − gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. G, Procedure for coculture of DRG neurons and gastric cancer cells. H, Western blotting was used to analyze ABHD16A levels in MFC cells cocultured with DRG neurons or DRG neuron–derived CM. GAPDH served as the loading control. I, Expression of HIF1A and ABHD16A in neurotransmitter [HA, dopamine (DA), 5-HT, norepinephrine (NE), ACh]-treated MFC cells and ACh-treated MGC-803 cells. J, ACh concentration was detected in DRG CM by ELISA. K, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer tumors with or without vagotomy. L, Representative mIF staining images of FOXP3, CD163, CD11b, <t>CD8,</t> PD-L1, and Pan-CK in gastric cancer tissues with high or low expression of ABHD16A. Scale bar, 100 μm. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.
    Fitc Anti Mouse Cd8a, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fitc anti mouse cd8a/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fitc anti mouse cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Elabscience Biotechnology pe cd8
    Elevated ABHD16A triggered by ACh was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. A, Representative IHC images of ABHD16A expression in human normal gastric tissues and gastric cancer tissues from the TMA with magnifications of 40×, 100×, and 200×. Scale bar for 200×, 100 μm. B–D, Relationship of ABHD16A IHC score to clinical stage ( B ), pT stage ( C ), and lymph node metastasis ( n = 80; D ). E, Cumulative survival curves of patients with gastric cancer with high or low ABHD16A expression based on the TMA. F, IHC images and score of ABHD16A in S100 + or S100 − gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. G, Procedure for coculture of DRG neurons and gastric cancer cells. H, Western blotting was used to analyze ABHD16A levels in MFC cells cocultured with DRG neurons or DRG neuron–derived CM. GAPDH served as the loading control. I, Expression of HIF1A and ABHD16A in neurotransmitter [HA, dopamine (DA), 5-HT, norepinephrine (NE), ACh]-treated MFC cells and ACh-treated MGC-803 cells. J, ACh concentration was detected in DRG CM by ELISA. K, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer tumors with or without vagotomy. L, Representative mIF staining images of FOXP3, CD163, CD11b, <t>CD8,</t> PD-L1, and Pan-CK in gastric cancer tissues with high or low expression of ABHD16A. Scale bar, 100 μm. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.
    Pe Cd8, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pe cd8/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pe cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Elabscience Biotechnology elab fluor violet 450 cd8
    Elevated ABHD16A triggered by ACh was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. A, Representative IHC images of ABHD16A expression in human normal gastric tissues and gastric cancer tissues from the TMA with magnifications of 40×, 100×, and 200×. Scale bar for 200×, 100 μm. B–D, Relationship of ABHD16A IHC score to clinical stage ( B ), pT stage ( C ), and lymph node metastasis ( n = 80; D ). E, Cumulative survival curves of patients with gastric cancer with high or low ABHD16A expression based on the TMA. F, IHC images and score of ABHD16A in S100 + or S100 − gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. G, Procedure for coculture of DRG neurons and gastric cancer cells. H, Western blotting was used to analyze ABHD16A levels in MFC cells cocultured with DRG neurons or DRG neuron–derived CM. GAPDH served as the loading control. I, Expression of HIF1A and ABHD16A in neurotransmitter [HA, dopamine (DA), 5-HT, norepinephrine (NE), ACh]-treated MFC cells and ACh-treated MGC-803 cells. J, ACh concentration was detected in DRG CM by ELISA. K, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer tumors with or without vagotomy. L, Representative mIF staining images of FOXP3, CD163, CD11b, <t>CD8,</t> PD-L1, and Pan-CK in gastric cancer tissues with high or low expression of ABHD16A. Scale bar, 100 μm. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.
    Elab Fluor Violet 450 Cd8, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/elab fluor violet 450 cd8/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elab fluor violet 450 cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Bio X Cell anti mouse cd8a antibody
    Elevated ABHD16A triggered by ACh was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. A, Representative IHC images of ABHD16A expression in human normal gastric tissues and gastric cancer tissues from the TMA with magnifications of 40×, 100×, and 200×. Scale bar for 200×, 100 μm. B–D, Relationship of ABHD16A IHC score to clinical stage ( B ), pT stage ( C ), and lymph node metastasis ( n = 80; D ). E, Cumulative survival curves of patients with gastric cancer with high or low ABHD16A expression based on the TMA. F, IHC images and score of ABHD16A in S100 + or S100 − gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. G, Procedure for coculture of DRG neurons and gastric cancer cells. H, Western blotting was used to analyze ABHD16A levels in MFC cells cocultured with DRG neurons or DRG neuron–derived CM. GAPDH served as the loading control. I, Expression of HIF1A and ABHD16A in neurotransmitter [HA, dopamine (DA), 5-HT, norepinephrine (NE), ACh]-treated MFC cells and ACh-treated MGC-803 cells. J, ACh concentration was detected in DRG CM by ELISA. K, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer tumors with or without vagotomy. L, Representative mIF staining images of FOXP3, CD163, CD11b, <t>CD8,</t> PD-L1, and Pan-CK in gastric cancer tissues with high or low expression of ABHD16A. Scale bar, 100 μm. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.
    Anti Mouse Cd8a Antibody, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse cd8a antibody/product/Bio X Cell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse cd8a antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec viobright fitc anti cd8a
    Elevated ABHD16A triggered by ACh was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. A, Representative IHC images of ABHD16A expression in human normal gastric tissues and gastric cancer tissues from the TMA with magnifications of 40×, 100×, and 200×. Scale bar for 200×, 100 μm. B–D, Relationship of ABHD16A IHC score to clinical stage ( B ), pT stage ( C ), and lymph node metastasis ( n = 80; D ). E, Cumulative survival curves of patients with gastric cancer with high or low ABHD16A expression based on the TMA. F, IHC images and score of ABHD16A in S100 + or S100 − gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. G, Procedure for coculture of DRG neurons and gastric cancer cells. H, Western blotting was used to analyze ABHD16A levels in MFC cells cocultured with DRG neurons or DRG neuron–derived CM. GAPDH served as the loading control. I, Expression of HIF1A and ABHD16A in neurotransmitter [HA, dopamine (DA), 5-HT, norepinephrine (NE), ACh]-treated MFC cells and ACh-treated MGC-803 cells. J, ACh concentration was detected in DRG CM by ELISA. K, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer tumors with or without vagotomy. L, Representative mIF staining images of FOXP3, CD163, CD11b, <t>CD8,</t> PD-L1, and Pan-CK in gastric cancer tissues with high or low expression of ABHD16A. Scale bar, 100 μm. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.
    Viobright Fitc Anti Cd8a, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/viobright fitc anti cd8a/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    viobright fitc anti cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Glycolysis inhibition-mediated blockade of H3K18la in HCC cells restores the function of co-cultured CD8 + T cells (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. (B) Changes in lactate levels in Huh7 cells after treatment with 2-DG or oxamate. (C–E) Representative WB results showing the levels of Pan Kla and H3K18la in Huh7 cells treated with inhibitors. (F) Lactate levels in DKO cells with or without lactate supplementation. (G and H) WB analysis of the protein levels of LDHA, LDHB, Pan Kla, and H3K18la in DKO cells with or without lactate treatment. H3 and β-actin were used as loading controls for lactylation markers and LDH isoforms, respectively. (I) Colony formation assays show the proliferation of HCC cells (control group vs. DKO group) cultured alone or co-cultured with CD8 + T cells. (J) Quantitative analysis of the proliferation of co-cultured CD8 + T cells by FC. (K) FC analysis of the expression levels of GzMB (L) and IFN-γ (M) in co-cultured CD8 + T cells. All data are shown as mean ± SD. (B, D, E, and G) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, (J) analyzed by two-way ANOVA, and (K) was analyzed by Student’s t test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Experiments were repeated three times.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Targeting KIF20A blocks lactylation modification to suppress immune escape in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115372

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Glycolysis inhibition-mediated blockade of H3K18la in HCC cells restores the function of co-cultured CD8 + T cells (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. (B) Changes in lactate levels in Huh7 cells after treatment with 2-DG or oxamate. (C–E) Representative WB results showing the levels of Pan Kla and H3K18la in Huh7 cells treated with inhibitors. (F) Lactate levels in DKO cells with or without lactate supplementation. (G and H) WB analysis of the protein levels of LDHA, LDHB, Pan Kla, and H3K18la in DKO cells with or without lactate treatment. H3 and β-actin were used as loading controls for lactylation markers and LDH isoforms, respectively. (I) Colony formation assays show the proliferation of HCC cells (control group vs. DKO group) cultured alone or co-cultured with CD8 + T cells. (J) Quantitative analysis of the proliferation of co-cultured CD8 + T cells by FC. (K) FC analysis of the expression levels of GzMB (L) and IFN-γ (M) in co-cultured CD8 + T cells. All data are shown as mean ± SD. (B, D, E, and G) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, (J) analyzed by two-way ANOVA, and (K) was analyzed by Student’s t test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Experiments were repeated three times.

    Article Snippet: APC Anti-Mouse CD8a Antibody , Elabscience , Cat# E-AB-F1104E; RRID: AB_3740201.

    Techniques: Inhibition, Cell Culture, Control, Expressing

    Knockdown of LDHA/B inhibits HCC growth by activating CD8 + T cell-mediated antitumor immunity (A) WB analysis of LDHA, LDHB, and β-actin (loading control) expression in control and LDHA/B DKO Hepa 1–6 cells. (B) Representative images of tumors dissected from tumor-bearing mice ( n = 6). Tumor weights (C), tumor growth curves (D), Kaplan-Meier survival curve ( n = 6) (E), and lactate contents in tumor tissues (F) of the control and LDHA/B DKO groups ( n = 6). (G) IHC staining of H3K18la and Pan Kla in tumor tissues (scale bars, 100 μm, n = 6). (H–M) FC analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells: TILs were isolated from control and LDHA/B-DKO tumors. FC plots (left) and quantitative statistics (right) show: the proportion of CD3 + CD8 + CTLs (H), the proportion of CD44hiCD62Llo effector memory CTLs (I), and the proportions of intratumoral GzMB + (J), and IFN-γ + (K) CTLs with representative scatterplots ( n = 6). Cell aggregates and debris were first excluded, followed by gating on the target cell populations and markers of interest. Representative FC plots and quantitative data are presented. (L and M) Tumor size and growth curves of mice treated with anti-CD8 antibody to deplete CD8 + T cells or isotype control (IgG) ( n = 6). (N) Mouse body weights at the end of the experiment ( n = 6). Data are presented as mean ± SD. (C–F, and H–M) were analyzed using Student’s t test, and (N) was analyzed by two-way ANOVA. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, not significant. All experiments were repeated three times. β-actin served as the loading control for WB experiments.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Targeting KIF20A blocks lactylation modification to suppress immune escape in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115372

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Knockdown of LDHA/B inhibits HCC growth by activating CD8 + T cell-mediated antitumor immunity (A) WB analysis of LDHA, LDHB, and β-actin (loading control) expression in control and LDHA/B DKO Hepa 1–6 cells. (B) Representative images of tumors dissected from tumor-bearing mice ( n = 6). Tumor weights (C), tumor growth curves (D), Kaplan-Meier survival curve ( n = 6) (E), and lactate contents in tumor tissues (F) of the control and LDHA/B DKO groups ( n = 6). (G) IHC staining of H3K18la and Pan Kla in tumor tissues (scale bars, 100 μm, n = 6). (H–M) FC analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells: TILs were isolated from control and LDHA/B-DKO tumors. FC plots (left) and quantitative statistics (right) show: the proportion of CD3 + CD8 + CTLs (H), the proportion of CD44hiCD62Llo effector memory CTLs (I), and the proportions of intratumoral GzMB + (J), and IFN-γ + (K) CTLs with representative scatterplots ( n = 6). Cell aggregates and debris were first excluded, followed by gating on the target cell populations and markers of interest. Representative FC plots and quantitative data are presented. (L and M) Tumor size and growth curves of mice treated with anti-CD8 antibody to deplete CD8 + T cells or isotype control (IgG) ( n = 6). (N) Mouse body weights at the end of the experiment ( n = 6). Data are presented as mean ± SD. (C–F, and H–M) were analyzed using Student’s t test, and (N) was analyzed by two-way ANOVA. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, not significant. All experiments were repeated three times. β-actin served as the loading control for WB experiments.

    Article Snippet: APC Anti-Mouse CD8a Antibody , Elabscience , Cat# E-AB-F1104E; RRID: AB_3740201.

    Techniques: Knockdown, Control, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Isolation

    KIF20A regulates PD-L1 expression via c-Myc (A and B) Huh7 and HCCLM3 cells were transfected with KIF20A small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or KIF20A overexpression (OE) pcDNA3.1 plasmids, respectively. The protein levels of KIF20A, c-Myc, and PD-L1 were measured by WB in Huh7 and HCCLM3 cells. (C) ChIP-PCR was performed to assess the binding of c-Myc to the PD-L1 promoter region in Huh7 cells. (D) Huh7 cells were transfected with c-Myc siRNAs, and the knockdown efficiency of c-Myc was verified by RT-PCR. (E and F) Huh7 and HCCLM3 cells were co-transfected with KIF20A OE plasmids and c-Myc siRNAs. The protein levels of KIF20A, PD-L1, and c-Myc were determined by WB. (G) Huh7 cells were co-transfected with pGL3-PD-L1 or pGL3-basic plasmids, KIF20A OE pcDNA3.1 plasmids, c-Myc siRNAs, and pRL-TK plasmids, followed by luciferase activity assay. (H and I) KIF20A promotes HCC cell immune evasion by regulating PD-L1 expression via c-Myc. HCC cells from different groups were co-cultured with CD8 + T cells. Representative FC plots and quantitative analysis of GzMB and IFN-γ expression in CD8 + T cells co-cultured with Huh7 cells. (J and K) Representative images and quantitative analysis of colony formation in Huh7 cells with or without CD8 + T cell co-culture. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t test (D), one-way ANOVA (C, I), or two-way ANOVA (G, K). ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. All experiments were repeated three times.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Targeting KIF20A blocks lactylation modification to suppress immune escape in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115372

    Figure Lengend Snippet: KIF20A regulates PD-L1 expression via c-Myc (A and B) Huh7 and HCCLM3 cells were transfected with KIF20A small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or KIF20A overexpression (OE) pcDNA3.1 plasmids, respectively. The protein levels of KIF20A, c-Myc, and PD-L1 were measured by WB in Huh7 and HCCLM3 cells. (C) ChIP-PCR was performed to assess the binding of c-Myc to the PD-L1 promoter region in Huh7 cells. (D) Huh7 cells were transfected with c-Myc siRNAs, and the knockdown efficiency of c-Myc was verified by RT-PCR. (E and F) Huh7 and HCCLM3 cells were co-transfected with KIF20A OE plasmids and c-Myc siRNAs. The protein levels of KIF20A, PD-L1, and c-Myc were determined by WB. (G) Huh7 cells were co-transfected with pGL3-PD-L1 or pGL3-basic plasmids, KIF20A OE pcDNA3.1 plasmids, c-Myc siRNAs, and pRL-TK plasmids, followed by luciferase activity assay. (H and I) KIF20A promotes HCC cell immune evasion by regulating PD-L1 expression via c-Myc. HCC cells from different groups were co-cultured with CD8 + T cells. Representative FC plots and quantitative analysis of GzMB and IFN-γ expression in CD8 + T cells co-cultured with Huh7 cells. (J and K) Representative images and quantitative analysis of colony formation in Huh7 cells with or without CD8 + T cell co-culture. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t test (D), one-way ANOVA (C, I), or two-way ANOVA (G, K). ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. All experiments were repeated three times.

    Article Snippet: APC Anti-Mouse CD8a Antibody , Elabscience , Cat# E-AB-F1104E; RRID: AB_3740201.

    Techniques: Expressing, Transfection, Over Expression, Binding Assay, Knockdown, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay

    Elevated ABHD16A triggered by ACh was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. A, Representative IHC images of ABHD16A expression in human normal gastric tissues and gastric cancer tissues from the TMA with magnifications of 40×, 100×, and 200×. Scale bar for 200×, 100 μm. B–D, Relationship of ABHD16A IHC score to clinical stage ( B ), pT stage ( C ), and lymph node metastasis ( n = 80; D ). E, Cumulative survival curves of patients with gastric cancer with high or low ABHD16A expression based on the TMA. F, IHC images and score of ABHD16A in S100 + or S100 − gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. G, Procedure for coculture of DRG neurons and gastric cancer cells. H, Western blotting was used to analyze ABHD16A levels in MFC cells cocultured with DRG neurons or DRG neuron–derived CM. GAPDH served as the loading control. I, Expression of HIF1A and ABHD16A in neurotransmitter [HA, dopamine (DA), 5-HT, norepinephrine (NE), ACh]-treated MFC cells and ACh-treated MGC-803 cells. J, ACh concentration was detected in DRG CM by ELISA. K, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer tumors with or without vagotomy. L, Representative mIF staining images of FOXP3, CD163, CD11b, CD8, PD-L1, and Pan-CK in gastric cancer tissues with high or low expression of ABHD16A. Scale bar, 100 μm. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

    Journal: Cancer Research

    Article Title: Nerves Stimulate Cross-talk Between Gastric Cancer and Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells to Enhance Immunosuppression

    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-25-3092

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Elevated ABHD16A triggered by ACh was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. A, Representative IHC images of ABHD16A expression in human normal gastric tissues and gastric cancer tissues from the TMA with magnifications of 40×, 100×, and 200×. Scale bar for 200×, 100 μm. B–D, Relationship of ABHD16A IHC score to clinical stage ( B ), pT stage ( C ), and lymph node metastasis ( n = 80; D ). E, Cumulative survival curves of patients with gastric cancer with high or low ABHD16A expression based on the TMA. F, IHC images and score of ABHD16A in S100 + or S100 − gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. G, Procedure for coculture of DRG neurons and gastric cancer cells. H, Western blotting was used to analyze ABHD16A levels in MFC cells cocultured with DRG neurons or DRG neuron–derived CM. GAPDH served as the loading control. I, Expression of HIF1A and ABHD16A in neurotransmitter [HA, dopamine (DA), 5-HT, norepinephrine (NE), ACh]-treated MFC cells and ACh-treated MGC-803 cells. J, ACh concentration was detected in DRG CM by ELISA. K, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer tumors with or without vagotomy. L, Representative mIF staining images of FOXP3, CD163, CD11b, CD8, PD-L1, and Pan-CK in gastric cancer tissues with high or low expression of ABHD16A. Scale bar, 100 μm. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used for flow cytometry: Brilliant Violet 605 anti-mouse CD127 (BioLegend, cat. #135025, RRID: AB_2562114, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD3 (BioLegend, cat. #100203, RRID: AB_312660, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD3 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1013E, RRID: AB_3675272, 5 μL/1×10 6 cells), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD4 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1097H, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC Anti-Mouse CD8a (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1104UC, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD19 (BioLegend, cat. #152403, RRID: AB_2629812, 0.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD11c (BioLegend, cat. #117305, RRID: AB_313774, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse NK1.1 (BioLegend, cat. #108705, RRID: AB_313392, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #103133, RRID: AB_10899570, 1 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse RORγt (BD Biosciences, cat. #562607, RRID: AB_11153137, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse IL22 (BioLegend, cat. #516411, RRID: AB_2563373, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF647 anti-STAT3 phospho (BioLegend, cat. #651007, RRID: AB_2572085, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #157604, RRID: AB_2876536, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD8b (BioLegend, cat. #126613, RRID: AB_2562774, 0.625 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD4 (BioLegend, cat. #100411, RRID: AB_312696, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD206 (BioLegend, cat. #141707, RRID: AB_10896057, 2.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend, cat. #157309, RRID: AB_2876535, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD25 (BioLegend, cat. #101907, RRID: AB_961210, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF700 anti-mouse FOXP3 (BioLegend, cat. #126421, RRID: AB_2750492, 0.12 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse Ly6G (BioLegend, cat. #127607, RRID: AB_1186104, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD274 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1132E, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP-Cyanine5.5 anti–T-bet (eBioscience, cat. #45-5825-80, RRID: AB_953658, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), PE/Dazzle 594 anti-mouse CD273 (BioLegend, cat. #107215, RRID: AB_2728124, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD274 (BioLegend, cat. #124315, RRID: AB_10897097, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), and PE anti-mouse MHC-I (H-2Kk; BioLegend, cat. #114907, RRID: AB_313614, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells).

    Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Derivative Assay, Control, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Staining

    IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), CD4 + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.

    Journal: Cancer Research

    Article Title: Nerves Stimulate Cross-talk Between Gastric Cancer and Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells to Enhance Immunosuppression

    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-25-3092

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), CD4 + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used for flow cytometry: Brilliant Violet 605 anti-mouse CD127 (BioLegend, cat. #135025, RRID: AB_2562114, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD3 (BioLegend, cat. #100203, RRID: AB_312660, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD3 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1013E, RRID: AB_3675272, 5 μL/1×10 6 cells), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD4 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1097H, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC Anti-Mouse CD8a (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1104UC, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD19 (BioLegend, cat. #152403, RRID: AB_2629812, 0.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD11c (BioLegend, cat. #117305, RRID: AB_313774, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse NK1.1 (BioLegend, cat. #108705, RRID: AB_313392, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #103133, RRID: AB_10899570, 1 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse RORγt (BD Biosciences, cat. #562607, RRID: AB_11153137, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse IL22 (BioLegend, cat. #516411, RRID: AB_2563373, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF647 anti-STAT3 phospho (BioLegend, cat. #651007, RRID: AB_2572085, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #157604, RRID: AB_2876536, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD8b (BioLegend, cat. #126613, RRID: AB_2562774, 0.625 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD4 (BioLegend, cat. #100411, RRID: AB_312696, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD206 (BioLegend, cat. #141707, RRID: AB_10896057, 2.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend, cat. #157309, RRID: AB_2876535, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD25 (BioLegend, cat. #101907, RRID: AB_961210, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF700 anti-mouse FOXP3 (BioLegend, cat. #126421, RRID: AB_2750492, 0.12 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse Ly6G (BioLegend, cat. #127607, RRID: AB_1186104, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD274 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1132E, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP-Cyanine5.5 anti–T-bet (eBioscience, cat. #45-5825-80, RRID: AB_953658, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), PE/Dazzle 594 anti-mouse CD273 (BioLegend, cat. #107215, RRID: AB_2728124, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD274 (BioLegend, cat. #124315, RRID: AB_10897097, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), and PE anti-mouse MHC-I (H-2Kk; BioLegend, cat. #114907, RRID: AB_313614, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells).

    Techniques: Expressing, Control, Knockdown, RNA Sequencing, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, Binding Assay, Sequencing, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Injection

    Combination therapy enhances the anti–PD-L1 immunotherapeutic effect in gastric cancer. A and B, After tumor formation, the orthotopic gastric cancer mice ( n = 5 per group) were treated with anti–PD-L1 (100 μg per mouse), GPR34 inhibitor (20 mg/kg), or XBP1s inhibitor (30 mg/kg) every 3 days or ACh inhibitor (2.5 mg/kg) daily. Combinations of anti–PD-L1 with each inhibitor followed the every 3-day dosing schedule for a total duration of 2 weeks via i.p. injection. Living images were used to monitor tumor progression at 5-day intervals from the time of drug administration ( A ); IHC and mIF were performed to detect PD-L1 and XBP1s levels and proportions of CD4 + (green) and CD8 + (red) T cells in gastric cancer tissues at the end of treatments ( B ). Scale bars, 1.000e+5 –∼ 5.000e + 5 p/s/cm 2 /sr for living images; 200 μm for IHC; 50 μm for immunofluorescence. C and D, Representative images ( C ) and tumor volume ( D ) of subcutaneous tumors. The administration protocol for the mice was consistent with the description provided in A and B . **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

    Journal: Cancer Research

    Article Title: Nerves Stimulate Cross-talk Between Gastric Cancer and Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells to Enhance Immunosuppression

    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-25-3092

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Combination therapy enhances the anti–PD-L1 immunotherapeutic effect in gastric cancer. A and B, After tumor formation, the orthotopic gastric cancer mice ( n = 5 per group) were treated with anti–PD-L1 (100 μg per mouse), GPR34 inhibitor (20 mg/kg), or XBP1s inhibitor (30 mg/kg) every 3 days or ACh inhibitor (2.5 mg/kg) daily. Combinations of anti–PD-L1 with each inhibitor followed the every 3-day dosing schedule for a total duration of 2 weeks via i.p. injection. Living images were used to monitor tumor progression at 5-day intervals from the time of drug administration ( A ); IHC and mIF were performed to detect PD-L1 and XBP1s levels and proportions of CD4 + (green) and CD8 + (red) T cells in gastric cancer tissues at the end of treatments ( B ). Scale bars, 1.000e+5 –∼ 5.000e + 5 p/s/cm 2 /sr for living images; 200 μm for IHC; 50 μm for immunofluorescence. C and D, Representative images ( C ) and tumor volume ( D ) of subcutaneous tumors. The administration protocol for the mice was consistent with the description provided in A and B . **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used for flow cytometry: Brilliant Violet 605 anti-mouse CD127 (BioLegend, cat. #135025, RRID: AB_2562114, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD3 (BioLegend, cat. #100203, RRID: AB_312660, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD3 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1013E, RRID: AB_3675272, 5 μL/1×10 6 cells), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD4 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1097H, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC Anti-Mouse CD8a (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1104UC, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD19 (BioLegend, cat. #152403, RRID: AB_2629812, 0.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD11c (BioLegend, cat. #117305, RRID: AB_313774, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse NK1.1 (BioLegend, cat. #108705, RRID: AB_313392, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #103133, RRID: AB_10899570, 1 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse RORγt (BD Biosciences, cat. #562607, RRID: AB_11153137, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse IL22 (BioLegend, cat. #516411, RRID: AB_2563373, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF647 anti-STAT3 phospho (BioLegend, cat. #651007, RRID: AB_2572085, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #157604, RRID: AB_2876536, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD8b (BioLegend, cat. #126613, RRID: AB_2562774, 0.625 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD4 (BioLegend, cat. #100411, RRID: AB_312696, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD206 (BioLegend, cat. #141707, RRID: AB_10896057, 2.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend, cat. #157309, RRID: AB_2876535, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD25 (BioLegend, cat. #101907, RRID: AB_961210, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF700 anti-mouse FOXP3 (BioLegend, cat. #126421, RRID: AB_2750492, 0.12 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse Ly6G (BioLegend, cat. #127607, RRID: AB_1186104, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD274 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1132E, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP-Cyanine5.5 anti–T-bet (eBioscience, cat. #45-5825-80, RRID: AB_953658, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), PE/Dazzle 594 anti-mouse CD273 (BioLegend, cat. #107215, RRID: AB_2728124, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD274 (BioLegend, cat. #124315, RRID: AB_10897097, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), and PE anti-mouse MHC-I (H-2Kk; BioLegend, cat. #114907, RRID: AB_313614, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells).

    Techniques: Injection, Immunofluorescence